Chris Jancelewicz

GET UPDATES FROM Chris Jancelewicz
 

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey: 26 Reasons To See It, From A-Z

Posted: 12/14/2012 11:00 am

The way I see it, you're either in one camp or the other:

a) You're a fan (often a big one) of The Lord Of The Rings, and absolutely cannot wait to see The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey.

or

b) You cannot stand any LOTR film, and think watching a bunch of fantastical characters walk from one end of a map to another is akin to a fork in the eye. Ergo, seeing The Hobbit isn't even a remote possibility.

This post is mostly for the b)s of the world. While it's usually fruitless to try and convince someone to go see a specific movie against their better instincts, I'm still going to try. The Hobbit is enjoyable on every level -- from story to cinematography to the performances -- and despite the inherent nerdiness of the franchise, even the non-geeks among us can identify with the triumphs of a small man over big foes. And, if you stop and think about it, a lot of the great movies of our time orbit around this basic, universal concept: hope, in its purest form, can lead us to realizing our dreams, or things we never thought possible.

If that doesn't convince you, cold-hearted cynic, that you too can enjoy The Hobbit, here are 26 reasons why you should re-consider and give it a chance.

Loading Slideshow...
  • A: Adventure

    Of course, the hobbits in <em>LOTR</em> and <em>The Hobbit</em> go on some big adventures. The fate of the entire world rests on their (little) shoulders. We, as viewers, live vicariously through them.

  • B: Bilbo Baggins

    Bilbo, like Frodo in the <em>LOTR</em> movies, is the perfect main character: he is smart, industrious and strong of heart, and hasn't an evil bone in his body. You just want to cheer for him as you watch him embark on the huge adventure.

  • C: Cate Blanchett And Christopher Lee

    One of the greatest scenes in <em>The Hobbit</em> features the return of Cate Blanchett (the elf Queen Galadriel) and Christopher Lee (the not-yet-evil wizard Saruman). I won't divulge any more here, but watching these two veterans on-screen together is a pleasure.

  • D: Dwarf Power

    Make no mistake: this movie centers on the story of the dwarves. You learn their entire backstory, how their ancient kingdom was destroyed, and why they need to go on a quest to Lonely Mountain. Good luck getting to know all 13 of them! (You can get some help <a href="http://news.moviefone.com/2012/12/10/the-hobbit-cast-character-guide_n_2272027.html">here</a>.)

  • E: Epic

    The size, scope and magnitude of <em>The Hobbit</em> are obvious; truly, at some parts in the movie the effects are jaw-dropping.

  • F: Fili And Kili

    Only one brother (Fili, on the left) is shown here, but he and brother Kili are earnest, diligent soldiers who like to crack jokes. Any target will do, though they particularly like to pick on Bilbo. They are also Thorin Oakenshield's (the fellow on the right) nephews.

  • G: Gollum

    Our favourite tortured soul returns in <em>The Hobbit</em>, and offers one of the most entertaining scenes in the movie. Andy Serkis masterfully plays the little guy, and even though we're aware of Gollum's intense lust for the ring, we can't help but smile whenever we see him on screen.

  • H: Hiatus

    For fans, <em>The Hobbit</em> will provide a much-needed salve after such a long hiatus. Re-entering Middle-earth is like having a dream filled with friends you haven't seen in a long time.

  • I: Ian McKellan

    Is there anyone in the franchise more beloved than Ian McKellan as Gandalf? He brings a magnetism to every scene he's in, and no one can make wizardry as cool as the Grey Wizard.

  • J: J.R.R. Tolkien's Masterpiece

    One of the best (and perhaps one of the most descriptive) authors of our time, J.R.R. Tolkien has created a universe filled with expansive mythologies and stories. They are timeless, and generations of kids and adults alike have, and will continue to have, fond memories of the series.

  • K: Kin

    Throughout the movie, there is a strong sense of camaraderie and brotherhood, and even though the dwarves are constantly heckling each other, they save each other's lives more than once, and would gladly die for their ultimate goal.

  • L: Lonely Mountain

    The dwarves, Bilbo and Gandalf are on their way to Lonely Mountain to reclaim the dwarves' stolen treasure/kingdom. It's <em>The Hobbit</em>'s Mordor, basically. (The Stone Giants pictured aren't on Lonely Mountain, but they're encountered on the way.)

  • M: Martin Freeman

    Freeman is charming, charismatic and funny as Bilbo, and is perfectly cast as the uptight little Hobbit.

  • N: New Blood

    It's a treat to see the original <em>LOTR</em> cast members in <em>The Hobbit</em>, but it's also nice to finally get some new blood in Middle-earth (not literally, of course).

  • O: Oin And Goin

    Oin is the white-haired dwarf, which means that he has the most knowledge in the group. He kind of reminded me of Santa Claus or Papa Smurf, in that patriarchal way. Goin (far right) is the father of Gimli, who, as we know, plays a huge part in <em>LOTR</em>.

  • P: Peter Jackson

    We have to hand it to Jackson; he really knows how to craft the perfect fantasy epic. While many critics are complaining about various aspects of the movie (three films instead of one, the film's length), you have to admit that, in another director's hands, this probably wouldn't have turned out as well as it did. Jackson is very passionate about these movies, and you can tell.

  • Q: Quest

    This is what it's all about. At almost three hours, the movie feels like a quest in and of itself -- but I have faith in you, you can make it through.

  • R: Radagast

    Meet Radagast, the Brown Wizard. Helplessly cute and endearing, the guy rides on a sled powered by a gaggle of super-fast bunnies. Despite his apparent insanity, he's quite powerful and is able to communicate closely with the forest animals.

  • S: Smaug

    <em>(Sorry, no pictures of Smaug for public consumption -- these imbecilic trolls will have to do.)</em> Smaug is the main enemy in <em>The Hobbit</em>, but we don't see much of him in this first installment. You gotta admit, though, that the idea of a gold-obsessed dragon is pretty cool, and we get some little glimpses of him at the beginning and the end of the movie.

  • T: Thorin Oakenshield

    Remember how much love you had for Aragorn in the <em>LOTR</em> movies? Well, make room in your heart for dwarf king Thorin. He is passionate, bad-ass, and does that look into the distance like nobody else.

  • U: Underdog

    As mentioned before, it's fun to root for the little guy -- even if you're cold and heartless. I dare you to sit through <em>The Hobbit</em> without smiling at least once.

  • V: Vivid Visuals

    A lot of people have been griping about <em>The Hobbit</em> being shown in 48 FPS (frames per second). I will admit it was a bit jarring at first, but the layperson audience probably won't really notice. There are several breathtaking vistas and scenes, plenty for the average audience to enjoy.

  • W: Wizardry

    Wizards are awesome. Always have been, always will be.

  • X: "X" Marks The Spot

    There's always a map to follow in the Tolkien universe, and <em>The Hobbit</em> is no exception. The characters must decipher some ancient text (with the help of the Elves) to ultimately find their goal.

  • Y: Young Audiences, New Experience

    <em>The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King</em> was released ten years ago. TEN YEARS AGO. If you've had a child since then, now's your chance to fully immerse them in the glory of the Tolkien universe. Even if you have nieces, nephews or random strangers to share with, go for it!

  • Z: Zeitgeist

    As with <em>Twilight </em>and our seemingly insatiable appetite for vampires in pop culture, <em>The Hobbit</em> stands to infiltrate every available opening in our society. Expect an influx of toys and references ("You shall not PASS!") in the months to come.

 

Follow Chris Jancelewicz on Twitter: www.twitter.com/CJancelewicz

FOLLOW MOVIEFONE CANADA
'FONE FINDS
The way I see it, you're either in one camp or the other: a) You're a fan (often a big one) of The Lord Of The Rings, and absolutely cannot wait to see The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. or b) You...
The way I see it, you're either in one camp or the other: a) You're a fan (often a big one) of The Lord Of The Rings, and absolutely cannot wait to see The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. or b) You...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 48
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
05:33 AM on 12/17/2012
The cast was good, the scenery lovely with some good performances. An unexpected journey, turned out to be the best journey.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:20 PM on 12/16/2012
I loved the LOTR films and was looking forward to this. Then there was the scare that Peter Jackson would not direct and I held my breath. Now, with him having stretched this out to 3 long films in the dreadful 48 FPS mode, I wish he didn't direct. The overdone King Kong and the disappointment of The Lovely Bones have shown us how Jackson is very capable of messing up and the negative reviews of The Hobbit have further discouraged me from investing 3 hours of my time with this. Very sad. BTW Jackson and Speilberg also messed up the charming Tin Tin series by tarting it up unneccesarily.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gskorich
12:29 PM on 12/16/2012
saw the movie Friday. great movie. sets were high quality, acting was great. didn't understand why the scene where they all got together had to be so long unless it was to introduce the characters. definitely a stepping stone to another movie. why a year until the next one?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FactoverNonsense
The ironing is delicious
09:51 PM on 12/15/2012
Saw it last night, and it was amazing! The reviewers are just b^tching because they think it gives them cred. It does not.
06:57 PM on 12/15/2012
If you think anyone in your 2nd category (those who can't stand LOTR) are going to waste their precious time clicking 25 times to see your reasons, you are either very good-heartedly naive or a bit self-important.

As for me, who's read and loved the Tolkien books, it makes my teeth grind to think of Peter Jackson milking this franchise for the money. Yeah, a trilogy suggests 3 movies. One book, however, does NOT suggest 3 movies. Making The Hobbit into one dynamic movie could have been thrilling, jam-packed and profound. Dragging it out over 3 movies and at least that many years is like eating styrofoam in the theatre instead of popcorn. Jackson's ego-envy of the Star Wars saga is showing. But he could make 10 LOTR movies and still not be as witty, interesting, profound and ORIGINAL as SW. Lucas cornered the market on mythology and symbolism with these movies and gave us believable characters in the process! One word: Princess Leia. Let's face it, Jackson, no one is EVER going to want to wear a Galadriel costume for Halloween. And Sauron won't replace Darth Vadar anytime soon. Get over it!
relevancematters
You're so full of what's right, you can't see what
11:19 AM on 12/16/2012
You need to give it a shot. I had similar thoughts, but my viewing last night put them to rest. What they've done is taken those obscure lines from the Appendices Timelines, and historical data that exists only in the Histories but which is most certainly canon, and created a very satisfying story. I know now--and feel acutely--why Gimli bowed his head and wept at Balin's tomb; I have a new and thrilling sense of the history of the Dwarves and their incredible lost city; I have had a glimpse of the White Council, and a look at Dol Guldur--which, let me tell you, is much creepier than Barad Dur. We get to see a depraved and dangerously feral Gollum, too long alone under the mountains, who illuminates in many ways the real danger Frodo later faced in him. What all this does is weave the greater tapestry that was always there, but didn't make it into the published works. And if you are a true Tolkien, then you know how much extant material there is, and how it textures and expands Middle-earth.

Great movie. I don't much care for the technology--especially the 3D--dear God, get rid of it!--but I came away otherwise delighted.
06:27 PM on 12/16/2012
Okay, you've convinced me. I'll go see it next week. Thanks!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iwannabeanexpat
i love to dance, anytime, anywhere
06:52 PM on 12/15/2012
27 reasons not to read this post -- you have to click through slides. Not happening.
11:24 AM on 12/15/2012
I loved the movie. The 3d and 48fps made it feel as if it was a play being performed right in front of you, and if that's not your style, just see the regular old style of the movie. Personally though, I would recommend seeing the 3D/48fps version--you can always watch the regular 2d when it comes out on DVD. For a 3 hour movie, I never once felt like it was being dragged out. The characters were wonderful and charming; I really don't understand how some reviewers said none of the dwarves had any character, because I found many of them to have been excellently performed. Don't go into the movie expecting something with the weighty epic feeling of the LOTR, as the Hobbit is just a more of a simple, whimsical story; it's a story with a lot of charm and humor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CindyV
10:40 AM on 12/15/2012
27 Reasons not to watch this film: the number of animals killed for your entertainment.
photo
bjammin
Authentic Frontier Gibberish
02:46 PM on 12/15/2012
Proven false.

Don't believe everything you read on the internetwebgoogles.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iwannabeanexpat
i love to dance, anytime, anywhere
06:50 PM on 12/15/2012
Proven true; you're in denial.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iwannabeanexpat
i love to dance, anytime, anywhere
06:50 PM on 12/15/2012
Exactly what I came on to say. The entire time (almost 3 hours of being subjected to CGIs of silly dwarf creatures) I would be thinking of the REAL creatures who needlessly suffered and died. No thanks, I have better things to do with my time.
10:26 AM on 12/15/2012
Could not understand a word Gollum was saying. Need subtitles. Lots of sword play but not one dwarf was killed. Those big guys could surely kill a dwarf easily. Not a big Hobbit/LOTR fan myself. Would like to see more of Kate B. and less dwarfs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Harry Nuggets
Just keep on keepin' on..
08:22 AM on 12/15/2012
That looks like a promo picture for a metal band. My guess is the guy on the right with the fuzzy hair is the drummer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CheapTrick
Them or Us.
08:01 AM on 12/15/2012
This movie was horrible. Overly long, stretched out, boring sequences with people sitting around a table and talking with deep overly important tones interrupted for no reason with pointless action sequences and the largest collection of cheesy cgi creatures since the last Twilight movie.

The 48-frame capture gives it the look of a bbc TV movie. Maybe an episode of dr. Who.

A massive letdown on par with The Phantom Menace and Superman IV.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FactoverNonsense
The ironing is delicious
09:45 PM on 12/15/2012
It was a fantastic movie. Brought the charm of the book to life, and punched things up enough to keep it interesting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gay-Curmudgeon
I'm not patronizing. I'm condescending!
06:54 AM on 12/15/2012
I saw the movie tonight in IMAX 3D. THAT'S THE ONLY WAY TO SEE IT!!! The 48 FPS helped a lot too because the visual effects were brilliant!

I've read the entire LOTR cycle 5 times over the past years, as well as The Hobbit, and the presentation on the big screen was an experience to be savored! I knew that this first offering was going to be long but the time flew by for me. I'm going to go re-read the book again as there were some details in the film that I didn't remember (since it had been a long time since I last read it.) I expecially appreciated the attention to details in the story line which was a source of irritation for me in LOTR (I still say that Peter Jackson should have included the scene with Tom Bombadill...but that's another discussion for another time!!)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dj Gray
I like V8
05:57 AM on 12/15/2012
I am something of an amateur Tolkien scholar, having written several essays on his works concerning Middle-Earth and obviously having read all the Middle-Earth material many times. My excitement level for this film is not high. Hearing that they turned this incredibly charming, short adventure into a 9+ hour trilogy really lowered my expectations, as I am dreading all the off the main narrative digressions that Jackson will make (especially things that have no basis in Tolkien's actual text). That said, I still expect to be entertained. The bar for these films is high, due to the masterpiece of the LOTR films, that there is no way he could equal or exceed them. I don't think it will be "Attack of the Clones" bad (bad sci-film...or WORST sci-fi film?). Just hope Martin & Benedict get back to doing what they do best sooner than later though! (Yep I am a Holmes geek as well!)
11:30 AM on 12/15/2012
I originally felt the exact same way, but never once did I think it was being dragged out too much while I was watching it. The time really just flies by, and it's an amazing rendition of the Hobbit, with all the charm that you would expect from the story. Personally I would recommend you see the 3d/HFR version, as I think they did an amazing job with it. The high frame rate eliminates a lot of the stutter effect that you get with 3d films shot at lower frame rates. To me it felt incredibly immersive, almost as if it was a play being performed right in front of me.
09:16 PM on 12/15/2012
they're drawing a lot of content from Tolkien's appendices in order to give the viewer a more thorough idea of what was going on in the far reaches of Middle Earth whilst The Hobbit's main journey was taking place. For example, Gandalf's dealings with Elrond, Galadriel, and Saruman in an attempt to banish the Necromancer. It makes for a lot more "oh, so that's why that happened" moments, which I enjoyed. (Though I guess having read the book and much of the lore surrounding it I had a bit of an advantage going into the theater.)
11:25 PM on 12/14/2012
This is a very tiresome film. Freeman is the bright spot, and the Gollum scene the standout. The dwarves are mostly interchangeable and hapless, and the narrative consists of them walking from one battle to the next, and getting bailed out in some silly fashion in every instance -- they accomplish nothing. There really is no story, and the dialogue is often an embarrassment: "Out of the frying pan..." "And into the fire!" Really? The 48-frames-per-second experience is hard to judge here, though I suspect one day it will be the standard. But Jackson does not know how to use 3D effectively, apparently not understanding that quick cutting and swift, swooping visuals don't work well in the format. I can't remember another film that managed to be so action-packed and yet tedious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FactoverNonsense
The ironing is delicious
09:48 PM on 12/15/2012
Wow. Read the books. That line you complained about was taken right from the book. I wanted the movie to go on longer, I couldn't believe it had already been 3 hours when the lights came up. I would recommend the Hobbit for everybody.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
syds180turn
Independent and Proud of It!
08:51 PM on 12/14/2012
Saw it and I can say with absolute certainty that The Hobbit painfully boring and excruciatingly long. I adored the LOTR trilogy, particularly the 1st and last film, but this movie was so over-hyped and underwhelming I really don't know where to start. In the LOTR films, you became emotionally invested in the charcaters...Froddo, Aragon, The Elves and all of the Hobbits but this film doesn't cause you to feel anything for the characters but one thing, you wish they would disappear off the screen quickly.